🚨 Hillary Clinton recently stated she would nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize — but only if he successfully ends the war in Ukraine without forcing Kyiv to surrender territory and while standing firmly against Vladimir Putin.

Her exact words: “I would nominate President Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize if he were the architect of ending this terrible war… if he could really stand up to Putin — something we haven’t seen, but perhaps this is the opportunity.”

The timing of her comment has raised eyebrows. It comes as fresh investigations revisit the origins of the Russia collusion narrative, much of which traces back to her own 2016 campaign.

The Steele dossier — a set of unverified rumors from Kremlin-linked sources — was covertly funded by Clinton’s campaign. It was funneled through intermediaries and friendly reporters to appear credible.

Her team also pushed the Alfa Bank hoax, alleging a secret Trump-Russia server connection, even after their own experts dismissed the data as baseless. Attorney Michael Sussmann carried that “evidence” to the FBI while tied to her campaign.

Although the FBI knew early that the accusations lacked merit, its leadership pursued “Crossfire Hurricane,” spying on Trump’s campaign and later his presidency.

Intelligence records now show that Clinton approved a plan in 2016 to smear Trump with Russian collusion claims as a distraction from her own email scandal. The CIA even briefed President Obama about it.

For years, Democrats and allied media fueled the “treason” narrative, while agencies acted on opposition research funded by Clinton. Now, with new subpoenas and expanded probes into Russiagate, her sudden talk of honoring Trump with a Nobel Prize seems less like genuine praise — and more like a smokescreen.